Tuesday, March 30, 2004
FRIST IS A TOOL
By Stockton
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), begat by good people, announced today that his office would be abolished and a new one, Chief Senate Tool for the White House, would take its place.
The announcement came after Frist took to the Senate Floor and suggested that flaming-commie-pinko-left wing-nut job, Richard Clarke perjured himself while testifying before the 9/11 Commission. Frist then bolstered his accusation by telling a reporter that he had no idea what Clarke said in the summer of 2002 or if Clarke had perjured himself.
What the F___? I was unaware that the Majority Leader of the greatest deliberative body in the world had to grab his ankles for the White House. Is this an actual part of the job description? Or is it a recent Executive Order?
To further compound his own embarassement, Frist has called on Congress to declassify Clarke's prior testimony. Is it an odd coincidence that this administration, who treats the President's lunch menu as a matter of national security, would seek to declassify the testimony of a counter-terrorism expert? Could the Republicans sacrifice national security for political gain? Shame on you Bill Frist, you tool.
|
By Stockton
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), begat by good people, announced today that his office would be abolished and a new one, Chief Senate Tool for the White House, would take its place.
The announcement came after Frist took to the Senate Floor and suggested that flaming-commie-pinko-left wing-nut job, Richard Clarke perjured himself while testifying before the 9/11 Commission. Frist then bolstered his accusation by telling a reporter that he had no idea what Clarke said in the summer of 2002 or if Clarke had perjured himself.
What the F___? I was unaware that the Majority Leader of the greatest deliberative body in the world had to grab his ankles for the White House. Is this an actual part of the job description? Or is it a recent Executive Order?
To further compound his own embarassement, Frist has called on Congress to declassify Clarke's prior testimony. Is it an odd coincidence that this administration, who treats the President's lunch menu as a matter of national security, would seek to declassify the testimony of a counter-terrorism expert? Could the Republicans sacrifice national security for political gain? Shame on you Bill Frist, you tool.
